Model comparison
MiniMax-M3 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiniMax-M3 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiniMax-M3 leads 30.1 to 20.7.
- MiniMax-M3 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $2.80 / $8.40 for Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct.
- MiniMax-M3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M3 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2026-06-01 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 512K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 41 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | 14.7% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1482 | — |
| SciCode | 47.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 640.02 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use MiniMax-M3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 37.7% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 4.6% | — |
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
| GBAEval | 0.9% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 2,158 | — |
Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 45.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 65.1% | — |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 14% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1447 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 8% | — |
| DTBench | 78.9% | — |
| LMCA | 33.7% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.95 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.4 | — |
Math Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | — |
| ProofBench | 18% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1429 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 90.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1461 | — |
Multimodal MiniMax-M3 leads
MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1253 | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| LMArena Document | 1435 | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1463 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1381 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1372 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1432 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1433 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M3 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1433 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1404 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M3 better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiniMax-M3 or Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
MiniMax-M3 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct lists at $2.80 and $8.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax-M3 does, with 1M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M3 and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiniMax-M3 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.