Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 29.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
Math Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.