Model comparison

MiniMax-M3 vs Olmo 7b Instruct

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M3 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M3 leads 62.1 to 25.8.

Side by side

MiniMax-M3 and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
MiniMax-M3Olmo 7b Instruct
ProviderMiniMaxAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index43.830.3
Released2026-06-01—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output512K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked4110

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding14691016
FrontierCode14.7%—
LMArena WebDev1482—
SciCode47.1%—
ALE-Bench640.02—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 7b Instruct
APEX-Agents37.7%—
OSWorld 2.04.6%—
GBAEval0.9%—
Vending-Bench 22,158—

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1447993
SimpleBench45.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)65.1%—
CritPt3.7%—
Chess Puzzles14%—
Mystery Game Puzzles8%—
DTBench78.9%—
LMCA33.7%—
Surface Evolver Bench55%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.95—
ForecastBench61.4—

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math14291018
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench18%—

Knowledge Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 7b Instruct
GPQA Diamond90.9%—
LMArena Expert1461—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Vision1253—
LMArena Document1435—

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1420977
LMArena Chinese14631014
LMArena Russian1428947
LMArena French1447—
LMArena German1426—
LMArena Japanese1381—
LMArena Korean1372—
LMArena Spanish1432—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1433978

Long Context Not comparable

MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1445—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M3Olmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text14331032
LMArena Creative Writing1404990
LMArena Multi-Turn14421007
EQ-Bench 41150—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M3 better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M3 or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M3 and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M3 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper