Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Olmo 7b Instruct
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 25.8.
- Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 30.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1016 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 993 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.