Model comparison

GPT-4 vs MiniMax-M2

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4 OpenAI

29.1

Rank #316 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiniMax-M2 leads 37.3 to 10.8.
  • MiniMax-M2 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $30 / $60 for GPT-4.
  • MiniMax-M2 accepts more context: 205K tokens versus 8K.
  • MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-4 and MiniMax-M2 specifications
GPT-4MiniMax-M2
ProviderOpenAIMiniMax
Noometry Index29.137.4
Released2023-03-142025-10-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window8K205K
Max output8K131K
Input $ / M tokens$30$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$60$1.20
Results tracked3821

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4MiniMax-M2
LMArena Coding12541370
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
LMArena WebDev—1297
WeirdML12.4%—
BigCodeBench Instruct46%—
BigCodeBench Complete57.2%—
HumanEval+79.3%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4MiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
METR Time Horizons36.1%—
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning MiniMax-M2 leads

GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4MiniMax-M2
LMArena Hard Prompts12411357
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—14.8%
Chess Puzzles4%—
Mystery Game Puzzles12%—
DTBench62.7%—
LMCA17.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard75.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index125.89—
ForecastBench57.8—
HellaSwag95.3%—
WinoGrande87.5%—

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4MiniMax-M2
LMArena Math12691352
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
MATH Level 523%—
GSM8K92%—

Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads

GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4MiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert12111337
GPQA Diamond35.7%—
MMLU86.4%—
TriviaQA84.8%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads

GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4MiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English12461313
LMArena Chinese12421366
LMArena French12831335
LMArena German12511355
LMArena Russian12511331
LMArena Spanish12611326
LMArena Japanese1209—
LMArena Korean1184—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4MiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following12411328

Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads

GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4MiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query12441331

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4MiniMax-M2
LMArena Text12631340
LMArena Creative Writing12441286
LMArena Multi-Turn12571361
EQ-Bench Creative Writing752—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4 better than MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4 or MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GPT-4 lists at $30 and $60.

Is GPT-4 or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M2 does, with 205K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and MiniMax-M2 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper