Model comparison

MiniMax-M2 vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.0 to 27.6.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
MiniMax-M2Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderMiniMaxMicrosoft
Noometry Index37.427.9
Released2025-10-272024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked2135

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding13701093
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)61%—
LMArena WebDev1297—
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
Terminal-Bench30%—
Vending-Bench 2160.6—

Reasoning MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13571072
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.8%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math13521111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert13371045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13131021
LMArena Chinese13661021
LMArena French13351076
LMArena German13551044
LMArena Russian13311022
LMArena Spanish13261085
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Korean—905

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13281053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13311044

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text13401073
LMArena Creative Writing12861037
LMArena Multi-Turn13611018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2 better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2 or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper