Model comparison
MiniMax-M2 vs Olmo 7b Instruct
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2 scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.0 to 25.8.
Side by side
| MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2025-10-27 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 205K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1370 | 1016 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 61% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1297 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 30% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 160.6 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1357 | 993 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.8% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 14.8% | — |
Math MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1352 | 1018 |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1337 | — |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1366 | 1014 |
| LMArena Russian | 1331 | 947 |
| LMArena French | 1335 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1326 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1328 | 978 |
Long Context Not comparable
MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1331 | — |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads
MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)
| Benchmark | MiniMax-M2 | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1286 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1361 | 1007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax-M2 better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax-M2 or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.