Model comparison

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads 48.6 to 26.0.

Side by side

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderNVIDIAAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index37.029.7
Released2024-12-18—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1410

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.3 (#212), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding12721016
BigCodeBench Instruct38.7%—
BigCodeBench Complete48.2%—

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 24.0 (#156), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1266993

Math Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 32.9 (#182), Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math12711018

Knowledge Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 33.5 (#194), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Expert1242—

Multilingual Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.7 (#212), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1245977
LMArena Chinese12631013
LMArena Russian1227946

Instruction Following Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 66.2 (#208), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1252978

Long Context Not comparable

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.5 (#210), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1239—

Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.6 (#197), Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b InstructOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text12831032
LMArena Creative Writing1269990
LMArena Multi-Turn12751007

Frequently asked questions

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper