Model comparison

MiniMax-M2 vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

36.9

Rank #201 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2 leads 36.3 to 18.0.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
MiniMax-M2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderMiniMaxAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index36.929.2
Released2025-10-272024-12-31
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked2112

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 39.1 (#151), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)61%—
LMArena WebDev1297—
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1370—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 24.9 (#102), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Terminal-Bench30%—
Vending-Bench 2160.6—

Reasoning MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 18.6 (#256), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.8%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1357—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
LiveBench—22.1%

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 34.6 (#158), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Omni-MATH—15.6%
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1350—

Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 36.3 (#160), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
MMLU-Pro—31%
GPQA (HELM)—31.6%
LMArena Expert1336—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 45.6 (#165), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1314—
LMArena Chinese1367—
LMArena French1336—
LMArena German1366—
LMArena Russian1332—
LMArena Spanish1326—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 70.4 (#160), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
IFEval—73%
LMArena Instruction Following1329—

Long Context Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#148), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Longer Query1332—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 53.3 (#157), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2OLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Text1340—
LMArena Creative Writing1288—
WildBench—68.9%
LMArena Multi-Turn1362—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2 better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.9 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2 or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper