Model comparison

MiniMax-M2 vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2 scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2 leads 53.0 to 42.7.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
MiniMax-M2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderMiniMaxNVIDIA
Noometry Index37.435.9
Released2025-10-272024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked2117

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding13701209
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)61%—
LMArena WebDev1297—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Terminal-Bench30%—
Vending-Bench 2160.6—

Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13571202
Kagi LLM Benchmark57.8%—
NYT Connections (extended)14.8%—

Math MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math13521216

Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert13371171

Multilingual MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English13131206
LMArena Chinese13661214
LMArena French13351197
LMArena German13551192
LMArena Russian13311219
LMArena Spanish13261195
LMArena Japanese—1128
LMArena Korean—1148

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13281203

Long Context MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13311225

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2 leads

MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text13401225
LMArena Creative Writing12861203
LMArena Multi-Turn13611214

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2 better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2 or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper