Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct NVIDIA

35.9

Rank #223 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 7 categories and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 48.1 to 42.7.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct specifications
Granite 4.1 8bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
ProviderIBMNVIDIA
Noometry Index37.435.9
Released—2024-06-14
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Coding13121209
LMArena WebDev1192—

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12931202

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Math13121216

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Expert13091171

Multilingual Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12611206
LMArena Chinese13371214
LMArena Russian12401219
LMArena French—1197
LMArena German—1192
LMArena Japanese—1128
LMArena Korean—1148
LMArena Spanish—1195

Instruction Following Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12691203

Long Context Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12751225

Writing & Preference Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bNemotron 4 340b Instruct
LMArena Text12901225
LMArena Creative Writing12511203
LMArena Multi-Turn12681214

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?

Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper