Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs MiniMax-M2.7

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M2.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 58.9 to 48.7.
  • MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index38.637.7
Released—2026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1230

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Coding13071454
LMArena WebDev—1398
SciCode—47%
WeirdML—37%
ALE-Bench—599.25

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
Terminal-Bench—45.1%
ExploitBench—13.3%
GBAEval—0%

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Hard Prompts12861422
NYT Connections (extended)—24.7%
CritPt—0.6%
Thematic Generalization—39.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.85

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Math12811420
ProofBench—3%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Expert12761444
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.9%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Non-English12651382
LMArena Chinese13461441
LMArena Russian12661383
LMArena French—1421
LMArena German—1398
LMArena Japanese—1262
LMArena Korean—1313
LMArena Spanish—1403

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Instruction Following12771405

Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Longer Query13411419

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10MiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Text12881405
LMArena Creative Writing12641354
LMArena Multi-Turn12841412

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than MiniMax-M2.7?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M2.7 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.6 vs 37.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 38.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper