Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

MiniMax-M2.5 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 48.1 to 38.5.
  • MiniMax-M2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.5 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 specifications
MiniMax-M2.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderMiniMaxAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.338.8
Released2026-02-12—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3314

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding13811314
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1387—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%—
ALE-Bench618.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Terminal-Bench42.7%—
Vending-Bench 2-23.16—

Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts13721299
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)16.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.68—

Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math13781298
ProofBench4%—

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert13791289
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.1%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English13381265
LMArena Chinese13931314
LMArena German13621231
LMArena Japanese11711207
LMArena Russian13581271
LMArena French1362—
LMArena Korean1232—
LMArena Spanish1354—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following13531275

Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query13661292
CL-bench11.4%—
CL-bench Life6.3%—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text13591299
LMArena Creative Writing13311262
LMArena Multi-Turn13641299
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1361—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

MiniMax-M2.5 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper