Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.5 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 38.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.3

Rank #188 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 36.5 to 26.9.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 3 32b Think specifications
MiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3 32b Think
ProviderMiniMaxAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index38.338.7
Released2026-02-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3314

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 48.1 (#58), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Coding13811319
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)75.8%—
LMArena WebDev1387—
SWE-bench Multilingual68.3%—
ALE-Bench618.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.5: 30.4 (#77), Olmo 3 32b Think: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3 32b Think
Terminal-Bench42.7%—
Vending-Bench 2-23.16—

Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 17.5 (#292), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Hard Prompts13721302
ARC-AGI-24.9%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark55.2%—
NYT Connections (extended)16.8%—
ARC-AGI-163.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.68—

Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 26.9 (#253), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Math13781316
ProofBench4%—

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 39.2 (#135), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Expert13791273
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.1%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 47.1 (#152), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Non-English13381255
LMArena Chinese13931300
LMArena French13621291
LMArena German13621290
LMArena Russian13581254
LMArena Japanese1171—
LMArena Korean1232—
LMArena Spanish1354—

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 71.5 (#148), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Instruction Following13531275

Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 37.5 (#216), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Longer Query13661296
CL-bench11.4%—
CL-bench Life6.3%—

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

MiniMax-M2.5: 53.9 (#153), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.5Olmo 3 32b Think
LMArena Text13591300
LMArena Creative Writing13311256
LMArena Multi-Turn13641290
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1361—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.5 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 3 32b Think score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.3 vs 38.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is MiniMax-M2.5 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.1 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.5 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.5 has 33 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper