Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.1 vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.9

Rank #178 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.3 to 31.1.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.1 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
MiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderMiniMaxMicrosoft
Noometry Index38.929.3
Released2025-12-232024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked2232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding14211101
LMArena WebDev1384—
LiveBench Coding—20.3%
ALE-Bench623.83—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Terminal-Bench36.6%—

Reasoning MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14111100
NYT Connections (extended)11.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math13971151
LiveBench Math—17.6%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert14311067
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13781058
LMArena Chinese14301061
LMArena French14041135
LMArena German13811080
LMArena Japanese1287966
LMArena Korean1298894
LMArena Russian13871111
LMArena Spanish13971111

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14001087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14161088

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text13921110
LMArena Creative Writing13611083
LMArena Multi-Turn13961068
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.1 better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2.1 or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.1 and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.1 has 22 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper