Model comparison

MiniMax-M2.1 vs o1-mini

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.9

Rank #178 Confirmed

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher in 9 categories and o1-mini in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.3 to 48.4.
  • MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-M2.1 and o1-mini specifications
MiniMax-M2.1o1-mini
ProviderMiniMaxOpenAI
Noometry Index38.934.0
Released2025-12-232024-09-12
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window205K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked2239

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143), o1-mini: 35.5 (#224)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1o1-mini
LMArena Coding14211362
Aider Polyglot—32.9%
LMArena WebDev1384—
WeirdML—36.3%
LiveBench Coding—48%
ALE-Bench623.83—
HumanEval+—89%
MBPP+—78.8%

Agentic & Tool Use MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98), o1-mini: 24.6 (#118)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1o1-mini
Terminal-Bench36.6%—
Cybench—10%

Reasoning MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302), o1-mini: 8.8 (#346)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1o1-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts14111333
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—18.1%
NYT Connections (extended)11.2%—
ARC-AGI-1—14%
LiveBench Reasoning—72.3%
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—135.82
LiveBench—57.8%

Math MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138), o1-mini: 35.4 (#186)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1o1-mini
LMArena Math13971358
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—46.9%
LiveBench Math—62%
MATH Level 5—89.2%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—1.7%

Knowledge MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147), o1-mini: 34.9 (#192)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1o1-mini
LMArena Expert14311316
GPQA Diamond—62.4%
Confabulations—18.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate11.8%—

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128), o1-mini: 43.6 (#182)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1o1-mini
LMArena Non-English13781289
LMArena Chinese14301314
LMArena French14041293
LMArena German13811278
LMArena Japanese12871245
LMArena Korean12981223
LMArena Russian13871283
LMArena Spanish13971303

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112), o1-mini: 66.7 (#206)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1o1-mini
LMArena Instruction Following14001304
LiveBench Instruction Following—65.4%

Long Context MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101), o1-mini: 40.1 (#161)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1o1-mini
LMArena Longer Query14161320

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.1 leads

MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120), o1-mini: 48.4 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-M2.1o1-mini
LMArena Text13921317
LMArena Creative Writing13611244
LMArena Multi-Turn13961314
Short-Story Creative Writing—64.9%
LiveBench Language—40.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-M2.1 better than o1-mini?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiniMax-M2.1 or o1-mini better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-M2.1 and o1-mini share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-M2.1 has 22 scored results on Noometry and o1-mini has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper