Model comparison
MiniMax M1 vs Qwen1.5-110B
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax M1 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.1 to 38.0.
Side by side
| MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.3 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2025-06-13 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.55 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1339 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1361 | 1185 |
Knowledge MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1317 | 1144 |
Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1319 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1360 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1370 | 1151 |
| LMArena German | 1350 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1217 | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | 1266 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1329 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1353 | 1142 |
Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | 1158 |
Long Context MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | 1157 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |
Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax M1 better than Qwen1.5-110B?
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax M1 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Qwen1.5-110B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.