Model comparison
Granite 4.2 8B vs Qwen1.5-110B
Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 49.6 to 38.0.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 8B | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 40.5 | 34.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 118K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.25 | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1329 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 8B: —, Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1185 |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1384 | 1144 |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1302 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1366 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1285 | 1118 |
| LMArena French | — | 1151 |
| LMArena German | — | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1044 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1142 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1301 | 1158 |
Long Context Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1320 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1236 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1301 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 8B or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Qwen1.5-110B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.