Model comparison
MiniMax M1 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
MiniMax
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiniMax M1 scores higher in 8 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where MiniMax M1 leads 46.0 to 41.4.
Side by side
| MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2025-06-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1359 | 1318 |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | 1302 |
Math Too close to call
MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1360 | 1315 |
Knowledge MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1316 | 1272 |
Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1320 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1361 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1369 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1350 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1330 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1220 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1354 | — |
Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1312 | 1275 |
Long Context MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1326 | 1296 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 69.4% | — |
Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads
MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | MiniMax M1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1343 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1298 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1335 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiniMax M1 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiniMax M1 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiniMax M1 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax M1 has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.