Model comparison

MiniMax-01 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#42); MiniMax-01 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-01 MiniMax

33.4

Unranked Sparse

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 61.6 to 33.6.
  • MiniMax-01 is cheaper at $0.20 / $1.10 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • MiniMax-01 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 1M.
  • MiniMax-01 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-01 and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
MiniMax-01Qwen3.7 Max
ProviderMiniMaxAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.451.5
Released—2026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M1M
Max output900K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.20$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$1.10$7.50
Results tracked233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
LMArena Coding—1498
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

MiniMax-01: 22.4, Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.7 Max
SimpleBench—70.4%
Kagi LLM Benchmark42.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1483
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.68

Math Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
LMArena Math—1490

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

MiniMax-01: 33.6, Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
Confabulations23.9%—
LMArena Expert—1488

Multilingual Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English—1474
LMArena Chinese—1530
LMArena Russian—1484

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1460

Long Context Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1482

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text—1476
LMArena Creative Writing—1449
EQ-Bench 4—1110
LMArena Multi-Turn—1481

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-01 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#42); MiniMax-01 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-01 or Qwen3.7 Max?

MiniMax-01 is cheaper. It lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-01 does, with 1M tokens against 1M.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-01 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-01 has 2 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper