Model comparison

MiniMax-01 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#36); MiniMax-01 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-01 MiniMax

32.8

Unranked Sparse

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.1

Rank #36 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 33.1.
  • MiniMax-01 is cheaper at $0.20 / $1.10 per million input/output tokens, against $1.30 / $7.80 for Qwen3.6 Max Preview.
  • MiniMax-01 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • MiniMax-01 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiniMax-01 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
MiniMax-01Qwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderMiniMaxAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index32.851.1
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1M262K
Max output900K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.20$1.30
Output $ / M tokens$1.10$7.80
Results tracked229

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.6 (#50)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.6 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
LMArena Coding—1472

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

MiniMax-01: 21.7, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 40.8 (#47)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.6 Max Preview
SimpleBench—63%
Kagi LLM Benchmark42.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1457
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.27

Math Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 52.2 (#40)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.6 Max Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
LMArena Math—1465
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

MiniMax-01: 33.1, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.6 Max Preview
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%
Confabulations23.9%—
LMArena Expert—1476

Multilingual Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.3 (#46)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English—1436
LMArena Chinese—1487
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Russian—1444
LMArena Spanish—1452

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.8 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1437

Long Context Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#59)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1457

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiniMax-01: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 64.0 (#58)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiniMax-01Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text—1447
LMArena Creative Writing—1435
LMArena Multi-Turn—1456

Frequently asked questions

Is MiniMax-01 better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#36); MiniMax-01 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, MiniMax-01 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

MiniMax-01 is cheaper. It lists at $0.20 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Max Preview lists at $1.30 and $7.80.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-01 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiniMax-01 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiniMax-01 has 2 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper