Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Step 3

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Step 3 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 54.3.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Pro and Step 3 specifications
MiMo-V2-ProStep 3
ProviderXiaomiStepFun
Noometry Index43.040.5
Released2026-03-18—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.43—
Output $ / M tokens$0.87—
Results tracked2317

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3
LMArena Coding14761367
LMArena WebDev1433—
ALE-Bench785.17—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3
LMArena Hard Prompts14571355
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
NYT Connections (extended)25.8%—
Thematic Generalization45.9%—

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3
LMArena Math14471366

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3
LMArena Expert14781333

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3
LMArena Vision—1177

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3
LMArena Non-English14161327
LMArena Chinese14561397
LMArena German14171371
LMArena Korean14001269
LMArena Russian14271331
LMArena Spanish14571371
LMArena French1469—
LMArena Japanese1366—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3
LMArena Instruction Following14451332

Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3
LMArena Longer Query14551326
CL-bench15.7%—
CL-bench Life6.9%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProStep 3
LMArena Text14361350
LMArena Creative Writing14151321
LMArena Multi-Turn14561341

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Step 3?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Step 3 better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Step 3 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper