Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs MiniMax M1
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and MiniMax M1 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 53.3.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.20 for MiniMax M1.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 1M.
- MiniMax M1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 42.4 | 39.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2025-06-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76), MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1359 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200), MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1340 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104), MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1360 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106), MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1479 | 1316 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77), MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1320 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1361 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | 1369 |
| LMArena German | 1417 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | 1220 |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1330 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | 1354 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46), MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1444 | 1312 |
Long Context Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67), MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1335 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than MiniMax M1?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or MiniMax M1?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.40 and $2.20.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro or MiniMax M1 better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 39.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and MiniMax M1 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.