Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.4 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 30.1 to 21.3.
- MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $0.43 / $0.87 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $2 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.4 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2025-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 23 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.9 (#101)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1441 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 30.1 (#79)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1428 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.7% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 36.3 (#118)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1440 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.7% |
Knowledge Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.3 (#102)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1479 | 1416 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 63% |
Multilingual Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.3 (#88)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1407 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1461 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | 1415 |
| LMArena German | 1417 | 1416 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | 1398 |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | 1366 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1403 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | 1436 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 71.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1444 | 1388 |
| IFEval | — | 81% |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#218)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1403 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 55.6% |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.2 (#116)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1417 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1415 |
| WildBench | — | 80.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.4 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.43 per million input tokens and $0.87 per million output tokens; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct lists at $0.50 and $2.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.