Model comparison

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen3.5 Plus

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

42.9

Rank #106 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 27.6.
  • Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus specifications
Phi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.342.9
Released2024-04-232026-02-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2.40
Results tracked3215

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LiveBench Coding20.3%—
LMArena Coding1101—
ALE-Bench—621.92

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—0.54

Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
Chess Puzzles—22%
LiveBench Reasoning15.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1100—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—80.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis30.3%—
LMCA—36.4%
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard79.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.78
HellaSwag77%—
LiveBench24%—
WinoGrande81.5%—

Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LiveBench Math17.6%—
LMArena Math1151—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—2.1%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
GPQA Diamond—84.8%
SimpleQA Verified—25.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.7%
LMArena Expert1067—
ARC (AI2) Challenge90.7%—
MMLU75.7%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA58.1%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Non-English1058—
LMArena Chinese1061—
LMArena French1135—
LMArena German1080—
LMArena Japanese966—
LMArena Korean894—
LMArena Russian1111—
LMArena Spanish1111—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LiveBench Instruction Following47.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1087—

Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
CL-bench—19.8%
CL-bench Life—12.4%
LMArena Longer Query1088—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284), Qwen3.5 Plus: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.5 Plus
LMArena Text1110—
LMArena Creative Writing1083—
LMArena Multi-Turn1068—
LiveBench Language12.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.

Related comparisons

Go deeper