Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.7

Rank #305 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 27.1.
  • Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Pro and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
MiMo-V2-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderXiaomiMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.029.7
Released2026-03-182024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.43—
Output $ / M tokens$0.87—
Results tracked2319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Coding14761039
LMArena WebDev1433—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%
ALE-Bench785.17—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14571028
NYT Connections (extended)25.8%—
Thematic Generalization45.9%—

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Math14471089

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Expert1478984

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English14161000
LMArena Chinese14561016
LMArena French14691039
LMArena German14171006
LMArena Japanese1366899
LMArena Korean1400856
LMArena Russian14271004
LMArena Spanish14571059

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14451023

Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1455996
CL-bench15.7%—
CL-bench Life6.9%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text14361050
LMArena Creative Writing14151024
LMArena Multi-Turn1456989

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper