Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Mistral
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 37.0.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), Mistral: 33.8 (#250)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1162 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), Mistral: 22.2 (#200)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1149 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), Mistral: 22.3 (#278)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1180 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 7.2% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), Mistral: 16.6 (#288)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | 1125 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 27.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 30.3% |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), Mistral: 32.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1129 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1109 |
| LMArena French | 1469 | 1180 |
| LMArena German | 1417 | 1155 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | 1013 |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | 1032 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1168 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | 1143 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), Mistral: 52.6 (#288)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | 1152 |
| IFEval | — | 56.8% |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), Mistral: 35.0 (#245)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1153 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), Mistral: 37.0 (#260)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Mistral |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1165 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1158 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1147 |
| WildBench | — | 66% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Mistral?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Mistral better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Mistral share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Mistral has 22.