Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 34.1.
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.0 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1130 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1127 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1173 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1478 | 1108 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1456 | 1108 |
| LMArena French | 1469 | 1110 |
| LMArena German | 1417 | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | 1400 | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1457 | 1095 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1445 | 1113 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1120 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1107 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.