Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.9 to 36.6.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 42.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219), MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212), MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1447 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229), MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1479 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1455 |
| LMArena French | 1156 | 1470 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | 1401 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1458 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1444 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.