Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Pro vs Muse Glimmer
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Muse Glimmer in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Glimmer leads 27.2 to 21.3.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 42.4 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.43 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.87 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.4 (#76), Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1433 | 1355 |
| LMArena Coding | 1476 | 1417 |
| ALE-Bench | 785.17 | — |
Reasoning Muse Glimmer leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 21.3 (#200), Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1457 | 1395 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 25.8% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 45.9% | — |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Pro: 36.7 (#104), Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1447 | 1419 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 40.8 (#106), Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1479 | 1388 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.9 (#77), Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1416 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1427 | 1393 |
| LMArena French | 1470 | — |
| LMArena German | 1417 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1366 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1458 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.2 (#46), Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1444 | 1374 |
Long Context Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#133), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1455 | 1381 |
| CL-bench | 15.7% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 6.9% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.9 (#67), Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Pro | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1436 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1415 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1456 | 1398 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Muse Glimmer?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.4 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Pro or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Muse Glimmer share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.