Model comparison
ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 3 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 22.1 to 17.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 25.8% for MiMo-V2-Pro.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 43.0 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1476 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | 45.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1457 |
Math Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1447 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1478 |
Multimodal Not comparable
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1469 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1457 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1445 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (43.0 vs 43.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.