Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Mistral Nemo

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Mistral Nemo Mistral AI

26.4

Rank #337 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 28.5.
  • Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
  • Mistral Nemo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Pro and Mistral Nemo specifications
MiMo-V2-ProMistral Nemo
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index43.026.4
Released2026-03-182024-07-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M128K
Max output131K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.15
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.15
Results tracked2310

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), Mistral Nemo: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMistral Nemo
LMArena WebDev1433—
LMArena Coding1476—
ALE-Bench785.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: —, Mistral Nemo: 23.5 (#125)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMistral Nemo
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—27.6%
BALROG—17.6%

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), Mistral Nemo: 20.7 (#232)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMistral Nemo
NYT Connections (extended)25.8%—
Thematic Generalization45.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1457—
DTBench—48.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.68
PIQA—83.5%

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), Mistral Nemo: 25.5 (#268)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Math1447—
MATH Level 5—10.8%
GSM8K—84.2%

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), Mistral Nemo: 12.3 (#298)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMistral Nemo
GPQA Diamond—29.9%
LMArena Expert1478—
BoolQ—82.5%

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), Mistral Nemo: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Non-English1416—
LMArena Chinese1456—
LMArena French1469—
LMArena German1417—
LMArena Japanese1366—
LMArena Korean1400—
LMArena Russian1427—
LMArena Spanish1457—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), Mistral Nemo: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Instruction Following1445—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), Mistral Nemo: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMistral Nemo
CL-bench15.7%—
CL-bench Life6.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1455—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), Mistral Nemo: 28.5 (#296)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMistral Nemo
LMArena Text1436—
LMArena Creative Writing1415—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—881
LMArena Multi-Turn1456—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Mistral Nemo?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 26.4 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Nemo costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Mistral Nemo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Nemo has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper