Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Pro vs Ministral 3B

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 5.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 41.4 to 10.4.
  • Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
  • Ministral 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Pro and Ministral 3B specifications
MiMo-V2-ProMinistral 3B
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index43.026.2
Released2026-03-182024-10-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M131K
Max output131K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$0.10
Results tracked236

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), Ministral 3B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMinistral 3B
LMArena WebDev1433—
LMArena Coding1476—
ALE-Bench785.17—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMinistral 3B
NYT Connections (extended)25.8%—
Thematic Generalization45.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1457—
DTBench—51.7%
LMCA—5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.1

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Math1447—
MATH Level 5—14.4%

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMinistral 3B
GPQA Diamond—25.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.3%
LMArena Expert1478—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), Ministral 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Non-English1416—
LMArena Chinese1456—
LMArena French1469—
LMArena German1417—
LMArena Japanese1366—
LMArena Korean1400—
LMArena Russian1427—
LMArena Spanish1457—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), Ministral 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1445—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), Ministral 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMinistral 3B
CL-bench15.7%—
CL-bench Life6.9%—
LMArena Longer Query1455—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), Ministral 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMinistral 3B
LMArena Text1436—
LMArena Creative Writing1415—
LMArena Multi-Turn1456—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than Ministral 3B?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 5.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and Ministral 3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper