Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Pro vs MiniMax-M2

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Pro Xiaomi

43.0

Rank #103 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 62.8 to 53.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 25.8% for MiMo-V2-Pro and 14.8% for MiniMax-M2.
  • Both cost about the same: $0.43 input and $0.87 output per million tokens.
  • MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 205K.
  • MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Pro and MiniMax-M2 specifications
MiMo-V2-ProMiniMax-M2
ProviderXiaomiMiniMax
Noometry Index43.037.4
Released2026-03-182025-10-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M205K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.43$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.87$1.20
Results tracked2321

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMiniMax-M2
LMArena WebDev14331297
LMArena Coding14761370
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
ALE-Bench785.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Pro: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMiniMax-M2
NYT Connections (extended)25.8%14.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts14571357
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.8%
Thematic Generalization45.9%—

Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMiniMax-M2
LMArena Math14471352

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert14781337

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English14161313
LMArena Chinese14561366
LMArena French14691335
LMArena German14171355
LMArena Russian14271331
LMArena Spanish14571326
LMArena Japanese1366—
LMArena Korean1400—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following14451328

Long Context MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query14551331
CL-bench15.7%—
CL-bench Life6.9%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads

MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-ProMiniMax-M2
LMArena Text14361340
LMArena Creative Writing14151286
LMArena Multi-Turn14561361

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Pro better than MiniMax-M2?

MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or MiniMax-M2?

MiniMax-M2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

Is MiMo-V2-Pro or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Pro and MiniMax-M2 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Pro has 23 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper