Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 vs MiniMax-M2

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads 29.3 to 19.4.
  • MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and MiniMax-M2 specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10MiniMax-M2
ProviderAmazonMiniMax
Noometry Index42.937.4
Released—2025-10-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—205K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1221

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.2 (#110), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Coding14301370
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
LMArena WebDev—1297

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10MiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 29.3 (#94), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Hard Prompts14271357
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—14.8%

Math Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 38.9 (#124), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Math14191352

Knowledge Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 39.2 (#136), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert14081337

Multilingual Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 51.4 (#108), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English13981313
LMArena Chinese14401366
LMArena Russian13951331
LMArena French—1335
LMArena German—1355
LMArena Spanish—1326

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 73.2 (#123), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following13871328

Long Context Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 42.4 (#125), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query13911331

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10: 59.5 (#110), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10MiniMax-M2
LMArena Text14201340
LMArena Creative Writing13501286
LMArena Multi-Turn14091361

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 better than MiniMax-M2?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 and MiniMax-M2 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 12 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper