Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Wizardlm 13b
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1035 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1018 |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1048 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Wizardlm 13b?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.