Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs Step 5 Preview

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Omni costs 8.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

47.9

Rank #58 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 9 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 40.0 to 29.7.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2.70 for Step 5 Preview.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 262K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Omni and Step 5 Preview specifications
MiMo-V2-OmniStep 5 Preview
ProviderXiaomiStepFun
Noometry Index43.647.9
Released2026-03-182026-09-16
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window262K1.02M
Max output131K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$1
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$2.70
Results tracked1818

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Step 5 Preview: 51.8 (#36)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Coding14661480
LMArena WebDev—1564
SciCode—58.9%

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Step 5 Preview: 40.0 (#57)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts14451465
CritPt—20.9%

Math Step 5 Preview leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Step 5 Preview: 46.1 (#72)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Math14301470
ProofBench—42%

Knowledge Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Step 5 Preview: 41.2 (#112)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Expert14491470

Multimodal Step 5 Preview leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Step 5 Preview: 41.0 (#41)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Vision12281267

Multilingual Step 5 Preview leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Step 5 Preview: 53.8 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English14041432
LMArena Chinese14651519
LMArena Russian14121436
LMArena Spanish14341439
LMArena French1447—
LMArena German1399—
LMArena Japanese1317—
LMArena Korean1355—

Instruction Following Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Step 5 Preview: 76.0 (#50)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Instruction Following14281444

Long Context Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Step 5 Preview: 44.5 (#64)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Longer Query14421455

Writing & Preference Step 5 Preview leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Step 5 Preview: 62.8 (#71)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text14231442
LMArena Creative Writing13921410
LMArena Multi-Turn14451447

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Step 5 Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.9 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Omni costs 8.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Step 5 Preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Step 5 Preview?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview lists at $1 and $2.70.

Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.8 versus 43.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Step 5 Preview share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper