Model comparison

Grok 4 vs MiMo-V2-Omni

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

48.1

Rank #56 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 6 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 44.1.

Side by side

Grok 4 and MiMo-V2-Omni specifications
Grok 4MiMo-V2-Omni
ProviderxAIXiaomi
Noometry Index48.143.6
Released2025-07-092026-03-18
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked4818

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 50.3 (#46), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Coding14081466
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.3 (#68), MiMo-V2-Omni: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4MiMo-V2-Omni
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.7 (#65), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Hard Prompts14091445
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
Chess Puzzles28%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.44—
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 48.4 (#64), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Math14221430
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%—
Omni-MATH60.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 53.8 (#55), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Expert14151449
GPQA Diamond87%—
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—

Multimodal MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Grok 4: 33.7 (#94), MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Vision12101228
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Grok 4: 51.8 (#103), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Non-English14031404
LMArena Chinese14271465
LMArena French14181447
LMArena German14291399
LMArena Japanese13941317
LMArena Korean13771355
LMArena Russian14101412
LMArena Spanish14201434

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.2 (#5), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Instruction Following13871428
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Longer Query14091442
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

Grok 4: 58.5 (#116), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4MiMo-V2-Omni
LMArena Text14111423
LMArena Creative Writing13971392
LMArena Multi-Turn14161445
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than MiMo-V2-Omni?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 43.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 43.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and MiMo-V2-Omni share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper