Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiniMax-M2.1

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.1 MiniMax

38.9

Rank #178 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2.1 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 29.7 to 16.6.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.1.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.
  • MiniMax-M2.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.1
ProviderXiaomiMiniMax
Noometry Index43.638.9
Released2026-03-182025-12-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K205K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$1.20
Results tracked1822

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Coding14661421
LMArena WebDev—1384
ALE-Bench—623.83

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: —, MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.1
Terminal-Bench—36.6%

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Hard Prompts14451411
NYT Connections (extended)—11.2%

Math Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Math14301397

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Expert14491431
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), MiniMax-M2.1: —

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Vision1228—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Non-English14041378
LMArena Chinese14651430
LMArena French14471404
LMArena German13991381
LMArena Japanese13171287
LMArena Korean13551298
LMArena Russian14121387
LMArena Spanish14341397

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Instruction Following14281400

Long Context Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Longer Query14421416

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2.1
LMArena Text14231392
LMArena Creative Writing13921361
LMArena Multi-Turn14451396

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than MiniMax-M2.1?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 38.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or MiniMax-M2.1?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.1 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is MiMo-V2-Omni or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper