Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3.5 Plus
MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.6 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 39.1.
- MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1430 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | — |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.5 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.6 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3.5 Plus?
MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.