Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs o3-pro

MiMo-V2-Omni and o3-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 42.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

42.9

Rank #91 Confirmed

o3-pro OpenAI

42.7

Rank #94 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.1 to 44.1.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $20 / $80 for o3-pro.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Omni and o3-pro specifications
MiMo-V2-Omnio3-pro
ProviderXiaomiOpenAI
Noometry Index42.942.7
Released2026-03-182025-06-10
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window262K200K
Max output131K100K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$20
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$80
Results tracked1812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-pro leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87), o3-pro: 55.1 (#22)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Omnio3-pro
Aider Polyglot—84.9%
WeirdML—58.2%
LMArena Coding1467—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86), o3-pro: 24.1 (#152)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Omnio3-pro
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.1%
ARC-AGI-1—59.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1445—
DTBench—86.9%
LMCA—38.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.43

Math Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112), o3-pro: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Omnio3-pro
LMArena Math1432—

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114), o3-pro: 29.0 (#234)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Omnio3-pro
Confabulations—14.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—23.3%
LMArena Expert1449—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62), o3-pro: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Omnio3-pro
LMArena Vision1228—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97), o3-pro: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Omnio3-pro
LMArena Non-English1404—
LMArena Chinese1469—
LMArena French1448—
LMArena German1398—
LMArena Japanese1318—
LMArena Korean1355—
LMArena Russian1412—
LMArena Spanish1432—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62), o3-pro: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Omnio3-pro
LMArena Instruction Following1428—

Long Context o3-pro leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72), o3-pro: 72.1 (#1)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Omnio3-pro
Fiction.LiveBench—97.2%
LMArena Longer Query1442—

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83), o3-pro: 57.1 (#128)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-Omnio3-pro
LMArena Text1424—
LMArena Creative Writing1393—
Short-Story Creative Writing—84.4%
LMArena Multi-Turn1446—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than o3-pro?

MiMo-V2-Omni and o3-pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.9 vs 42.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or o3-pro?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; o3-pro lists at $20 and $80.

Is MiMo-V2-Omni or o3-pro better for coding?

o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.1 versus 42.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and o3-pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and o3-pro has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper