Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3.5-9B

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 33.8 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.5-9B costs 1.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Omni's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified October 10, 2026. 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-9B

Alibaba (Qwen)

33.8

Rank #236 Confirmed

Summary

The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 43.3 to 35.9.
Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
Qwen3.5-9B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.5-9B specifications
	MiMo-V2-Omni	Qwen3.5-9B
Provider	Xiaomi	Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index	43.6	33.8
Released	2026-03-18	2026-02-23
Weights	Proprietary	Open
Context window	262K	262K
Max output	131K	66K
Input $ / M tokens	$0.14	$0.10
Output $ / M tokens	$0.28	$0.15
Results tracked	18	10

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Omni	Qwen3.5-9B
SciCode	—	27.5%
LMArena Coding	1466	—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Omni	Qwen3.5-9B
Terminal-Bench	—	9.2%

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Omni	Qwen3.5-9B
CritPt	—	0.3%
Chess Puzzles	—	12%
LMArena Hard Prompts	1445	—
DTBench	—	71.2%
LMCA	—	24.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index	—	139.46

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Omni	Qwen3.5-9B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions	—	48.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	—	61.7%
LMArena Math	1430	—

Knowledge Qwen3.5-9B leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Omni	Qwen3.5-9B
GPQA Diamond	—	79%
LMArena Expert	1449	—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Omni	Qwen3.5-9B
LMArena Vision	1228	—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Omni	Qwen3.5-9B
LMArena Non-English	1404	—
LMArena Chinese	1465	—
LMArena French	1447	—
LMArena German	1399	—
LMArena Japanese	1317	—
LMArena Korean	1355	—
LMArena Russian	1412	—
LMArena Spanish	1434	—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Omni	Qwen3.5-9B
LMArena Instruction Following	1428	—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Omni	Qwen3.5-9B
LMArena Longer Query	1442	—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	MiMo-V2-Omni	Qwen3.5-9B
LMArena Text	1423	—
LMArena Creative Writing	1392	—
LMArena Multi-Turn	1445	—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Qwen3.5-9B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.