Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Muse Glimmer
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and Muse Glimmer in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 29.7 to 25.7.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.6 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2026-03-18 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1430 | 1417 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1449 | 1386 |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1465 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1412 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1317 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1434 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1428 | 1375 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1442 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Omni | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1423 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Muse Glimmer?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Omni or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.