Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 53.8.
- Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 43.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1466 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1445 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1430 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | 1465 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1412 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1428 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.