Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs Ministral 3B

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Omni's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

Ministral 3B Mistral AI

26.2

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 40.5 to 10.4.
  • Ministral 3B is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.10 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
  • Ministral 3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Omni and Ministral 3B specifications
MiMo-V2-OmniMinistral 3B
ProviderXiaomiMistral AI
Noometry Index43.626.2
Released2026-03-182024-10-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K131K
Max output131K262K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$0.10
Results tracked186

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), Ministral 3B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMinistral 3B
LMArena Coding1466—

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), Ministral 3B: 18.4 (#282)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMinistral 3B
LMArena Hard Prompts1445—
DTBench—51.7%
LMCA—5.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.1

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), Ministral 3B: 26.6 (#258)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMinistral 3B
LMArena Math1430—
MATH Level 5—14.4%

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), Ministral 3B: 10.4 (#302)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMinistral 3B
GPQA Diamond—25.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.3%
LMArena Expert1449—

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), Ministral 3B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMinistral 3B
LMArena Vision1228—

Multilingual Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), Ministral 3B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMinistral 3B
LMArena Non-English1404—
LMArena Chinese1465—
LMArena French1447—
LMArena German1399—
LMArena Japanese1317—
LMArena Korean1355—
LMArena Russian1412—
LMArena Spanish1434—

Instruction Following Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), Ministral 3B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMinistral 3B
LMArena Instruction Following1428—

Long Context Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), Ministral 3B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMinistral 3B
LMArena Longer Query1442—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), Ministral 3B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMinistral 3B
LMArena Text1423—
LMArena Creative Writing1392—
LMArena Multi-Turn1445—

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than Ministral 3B?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index. Ministral 3B costs 1.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2-Omni's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or Ministral 3B?

Ministral 3B is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and Ministral 3B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and Ministral 3B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper