Model comparison
GPT-4.1 nano vs MiMo-V2-Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 nano scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 43.0 to 23.7.
- Both cost about the same: $0.10 input and $0.40 output per million tokens.
- GPT-4.1 nano accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 nano | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.10 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 25.9% | 25.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1306 | 1443 |
| Aider Polyglot | 8.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| WeirdML | 19% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 33% | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1286 | 1420 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 33.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LMCA | 5.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 129.62 | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 28.9% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 36.7% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 70% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1272 | 1425 |
| GPQA Diamond | 48.9% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 55% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 50.7% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1063 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1260 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1270 | 1462 |
| LMArena German | 1288 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1198 | 1325 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1267 | 1392 |
| IFEval | 84.3% | — |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1283 | 1409 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 25% | — |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 nano | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1285 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1260 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | 1404 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 946 | — |
| WildBench | 81.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 nano better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or MiMo-V2-Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 nano lists at $0.10 and $0.40.
Is GPT-4.1 nano or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 24.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 nano does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 nano and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 nano has 38 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.