Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs Step 1o Turbo 202506

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Step 1o Turbo 202506 StepFun

39.7

Rank #160 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Step 1o Turbo 202506 in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 53.1.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Flash and Step 1o Turbo 202506 specifications
MiMo-V2-FlashStep 1o Turbo 202506
ProviderXiaomiStepFun
Noometry Index41.339.7
Released2025-12-16—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.14—
Output $ / M tokens$0.28—
Results tracked2114

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 39.2 (#160)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Coding14431339
LMArena WebDev1330—
SciCode25.9%—
ALE-Bench737.95—

Reasoning Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 26.8 (#129)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Hard Prompts14201335
CritPt0%—

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.6 (#164)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Math13961318

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#176)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Expert14251308

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Flash: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#80)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Vision—1186

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.3 (#173)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Non-English13921313
LMArena Chinese14621380
LMArena German13951314
LMArena Russian13871327
LMArena French1429—
LMArena Japanese1325—
LMArena Korean1358—
LMArena Spanish1420—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.2 (#176)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Instruction Following13921310

Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.0 (#146)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Longer Query14091348

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.1 (#160)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashStep 1o Turbo 202506
LMArena Text14111336
LMArena Creative Writing13751307
LMArena Multi-Turn14041340

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?

Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper