Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Step 1o Turbo 202506
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
StepFunSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 7 categories and Step 1o Turbo 202506 in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 53.1.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Step 1o Turbo 202506 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 39.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 39.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1339 |
Reasoning Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 26.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1335 |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.6 (#164)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1318 |
Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#176)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1308 |
Multimodal Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#80)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | 1186 |
Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1380 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1327 |
| LMArena German | — | 1314 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1310 |
Long Context Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1348 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.1 (#160)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1307 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1340 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?
GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?
GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 39.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.