Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 29.0 to 24.9.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $1.13 for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 66K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | 326.4 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1396 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | — |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen3.6 Flash?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.19 and $1.13.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.