Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 49.4.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1314 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| SciCode | 25.9% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1299 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1298 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1289 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1275 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.